Friday, March 16, 2012

Chris Matthews calls out Glenn Beck for lying

Home Disclaimer Contents For Glenn Beck Share This URL
In the following back and forth between Chris Matthews from MSNBC and Glenn Beck of GBTV, which is NOT television, Beck calls Matthews a religious bigot. Matthews takes issue with Beck's deceitfulness, a character trait of Mr. Beck that his followers just cannot hear or comprehend.

This is from Glenn Beck's website:

This is Matthews' rebuttal taken from the MSNBC website:

This is just one more example of deception and purposeful smearing on Beck's behalf. It's what he does; it's who he is.
Before more people are taken in by Beck's deceitfulness, 
get involved
Post a comment or call the police.
All non-spam comments approved
Free speech is practiced here
Please get involved for 10 minutes
Share this URL with your friends
Thank you

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

One reason Beck's followers cannot detect his blatant hypocricies

Home Disclaimer Contents For Glenn Beck Share This URL
The comment system used by Glenn Beck and many other blogs and websites that allow comments is called Disqus.  It provides a history of comments that allows an ad hoc group of Beck's army of followers/supporters to track, find and attack my comments and me personally where ever Disqus is used. This has become the case even after Disqus provided a "Privacy" button. They make the effort to search for my Disqus name.

One site that uses it is the left/progressive site Mother Jones, and after writing a comment on a piece entitled "The Metaphysics of Citizens United and Campaign Finance Law," the flame warriors attacked. One comment, in particular, was note worthy.  Todd Scheller's obnoxious antics and deceitful methodology have been documented here before, but this comment explains why at least he is blind to Glenn Beck's serial hypocrisy. [Updates, below, of this silliness extend to near the end of 2013 with a clear conclusion.]

Before demonstrating Todd's blatant hypocrisy express in his remarks, understand that all comments pasted below have been captured using Jing which takes a digital photograph of whatever is on the computer screen.  This way, they cannot be modified before publishing them. Also, responding to a comment by "Sandie," a Beckerhead previously documented that was so nasty that the webmaster at Mother Jones removed it, the following was written by this blogger.  Note the typo in spelling Todd's last name at the end of my explanation of the warning I felt compelled to convey to Todd's wife on Facebook. He and others were claiming that I "threatened" her.

Todd, as is his wont, took umbrage with the facts of the matter and wrote the following. Note his last FYI:

First, I did not edit the query to his wife. (Jing copied below).  Todd's reactionary assimilation of my words is at work when he absurdly interprets a warning to his wife as a "threat."  How I attacked his wife again is not evident, but he links to my wife's Facebook page and insults her beauty.  Then he refers to my older brother as my son, so we have the usual degree of arrogant ignorance on display.  However, it's the FYI that caught my attention.  Even though Todd is replying to "Victor Tiffany," he addresses the comment to "Viktor." This is no typo, as Todd has taken to this particular distortion used by others in his group of character assassins recently as demonstrated below.  Apparently, it is important to these people that they strive to anger me as much as my efforts to expose their hero as the liar, hypocrite, reactionary propagandist and ignorant charlatan angers them. (An example is offered below.)

"FYI: You idiot, there is a c in my name: Scheller"  Not only is Todd insulting my intelligence (again) while writing a sentence with incorrect punctuation, he's insulting my IQ over a typo in his name while intentionally misspelling my name.  Now we know why Beck's gullible and ardent followers cannot detect it when Beck demonstrates any of his serial hypocrisies; they don't know when they (or at least Todd) are being blatant hypocrites! It get's worse.

This is a Jing shot of my complete message of concern to Todd's wife, Lisa:

This is the evidence that Todd's spelling of my name was no typo.

destroyer of people's souls

I wonder if Todd has enough property to make it worth a lawsuit for libel. I have the records that my contact with his wife was no threat and was done because of Todd's threatening quality of "The Game all changes on Tuesday." Thank goodness that Beck is off the airwaves now, and this hobby can be tucked away. It's time to move on, away from the mission to expose Mr. Beck for what he truly is.  We can be glad that mission is accomplished even though its obvious that massive amounts of damage has been done to his viewers minds.

Update, 3/16/2012: Todd will often insult my intelligence for making typos or any number of other reasons during this flame war.  Then, I'll spot something like this:

Some people will realize that the truth cannot be debunked because it's not bunk, but apparently this has to be explained to people like Todd, Sandie and Bill  -- three of the eight or so people who abuse the history feature of the Disqus commenting system to wage a sleazy campaign of character assassination. Todd can neither correctly write fantasy in plural form nor understand that truth is not bunk. He is one pathetic, obnoxious and arrogant prick and not qualified to criticize anyone's intelligence, something I show indisputably below. People like Todd personify the descriptive word for Beck's followers. They are truly Beckerheads.

Another update, 6/17/2012: Todd, "debunk the truth," Scheller's flame war of character assassination has escalated yet again. Get a load of the dishonest, malicious and sleazy question Todd asked during one of dozens of flame wars he and his fellow Beckerheads are waging against this blogger around the Internet.

This is the same asshole who is constantly posting a list of supposed "lies" that I've told. One wonders, since he is not hiding behind anonymity, if Todd has a good lawyer. Todd is exposed in this updated post as a hypocrite, a moron and a liar; and he "thinks" that he has me on the defensive.

Another update, 12/2/2013 (still!): Unless I delete my comments, turning them into ones by "Guest," Todd is still criminally harassing me in nonstop flame wars. The most recent series of attacks captured, again, Todd's blatant dishonesty and/or chilling stupidity. Again, the following are Jing screen shots. Responding to a point I made, Todd's fellow Beckerhead wrote:

Todd replies:

I confronted Todd about this false claim using information from Wikipedia, and he later wrote:

Apparently, he can get Wilson to have written what Todd wants him to, no matter what Wilson put to paper. Read Wilson's "The Author and Signers of the Declaration" and tell me in comments below where the former President mentioned any of the 27 complaints or their reduction to "taxation without representation." I asked Todd how he could take his misunderstanding from Wilson's essay, and he replied:

Not a word about "taxation without representation, and I'm "the real moron here." Also there's a provable lie expressed in his false claim of "three days." Todd's comment is from two days ago (seen at bottom of Jing shot), and his posting of the link to Wilson's essay is from three days ago (as you can see from the previous Jing shot). Todd is a hypocrite, a liar and someone who turns the meanings of (Wilson's) words into completely made-up misunderstandings! Todd is clearly not mentally retarded, but he's a fucking idiot who routinely projects his relatively low IQ onto those he disagrees with online. Calling Todd disagreeable is an understatement. He's a stupid character assassin and I believe that his relentless taunting, insults and personal attacks amount to criminal harassment. The FBI, unfortunately, have more important crimes to investigate.

Update, 12/07/2013: On yet another page that Todd has stalked me to continue his childish flame war against me, a Politico piece about the passing of Nelson Mendela, he makes the following Jing copied claim:

There you have it. The racist, fascist apartheid regime was, according to Todd "if you knew your history" Scheller, "LEFTIST." This is the same Beckerhead claiming that W. Wilson is a historical revisionist! This fan of Glenn Beck really has gall to insult anyone's intelligence, but that is his standard insult, apparent on many of the dozens and dozens of comments he wrote on that Politico page and everywhere else he attacks progressives.

Todd's intimate "knowledge" of  the apartheid regime was expressed again on that same news post in the following comment addressing the time when Nelson Mandela was trying to divorce his wife, Winnie, around 1992:

Got that? "MILLIONS." Todd wrote, "Lesson might be learned if you knew your history." Here's the facts about Todd's ridiculous claim: 
"Max Coleman's authoritative book analyses all deaths due to political violence from 1948 to 1994 in South Africa and Namibia.   
According to the Human Rights Commission statistics, 21,000 people died in political violence in South Africa during apartheid - of whom 14,000 people died during the six-year transition process from 1990 to 1994. The book lists the number of incidents, dates, and those involved. 
This includes SA Defence Force actions, for instance the 600 deaths at Kassinga in Angola during the war in 1978. 
Of those deaths, the vast majority, 92%, have been primarily due to Africans killing Africans -- such as the inter-tribal battles for territory: this book's detailed analyses of the period June 1990 to July 1993 indicates a total of 8580 (92%) of the 9,325 violent deaths during the period June 1990 to July 1993 were caused by Africans killing Africans, or as the news media often calls it, "Black on Black" violence - hostel killings, Inkatha Freedom Party versus ANC killlings, and taxi and turf war violence."

Final? update, 12/23/2013: On yet another battle field (right-wing blog post on double standards at NBC), where Todd found a comment that was not "Guested" (deleted on the Disqus Dashboard) in time to hide from his searching for me, Todd strikes again, over and over and over. Todd and his progressive-hunting "Christian" pals unloaded another barrage of vindictive and vile personal attacks on me again in the comment section. After mentioning that I was planning on "disappearing" from their sight by deleting my long-held Disqus account, Todd replied to a question from Sandie, now going by the sock-name "Watch It." 

I have previously described these "Beckerhead flame wars" as "what fascism looks like." How is driving me off the Internet to go hide under Todd's "radar" until they discover my next Disqus name anything close to "freedom of speech?" Only my silence, my non-participation in the widely used, Disqus system of commenting on blogs and websites.

Todd has argued repeatedly that it's OK, not racist, to call President Obama, or any other black man, "boy."
Todd was a Marine and is still involved with online war games.
Todd is an uber-nationalist. 
Todd supports American empire.
Todd supports corporate constitutional rights and the Citizens United decision.
Todd insists that fascism is a left-wing political philosophy.

Todd Scheller, and his pals, are American fascists. He's been programmed by Mr. Beck and other parts of the right-wing echo chamber to believe otherwise, that fascism must be about large government rather than the historically relevant corporate governance. That only conveys just how effective the tea party, extremist, reactionary, racist, Republican-base end of party-media complex misinforms their empire-supporting "patriots." It's impressive.

It seems that the corporate/business end of the Republican Party has a challenge from the Glenn Beck/tea party side of what is a GOP threatened by division. Beck's recent response to John Boehner hinted at rocky road ahead. Is Glenn Beck selfish enough to push for candidate who can't win, even after the primary voters pick one who can? I doubt it; he is, like his allies the Koch brothers, on the fringe to help pull the US backward toward corporate dominance of American society and elections by using the Republican party as a brand-name, RINOs on the reactionary, fascistic right. Not all reactionaries who support Glenn Beck are fascists, but most of those who are not so on the bases of race or militarily use, are ardent Bible-thumpers who question the separation between church and state, a different type of fascism. 

For a summary about Glenn Beck, see "Becoming Paul Revere"
Before more people start tuning into Beck's reactionary, yellow propaganda
get involved!
Post a comment
Please get involved for 10 minutes

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Benny, the racist, Hill escalates his silly flame war and demonstrates Beck's danger to America

Home Disclaimer Contents For Glenn Beck Share This URL
The flame war against this blogger, who has the audacity to post comments on Glenn Beck's website, has escalated recently.  Benny___Hill's sleazy tactics have been documented here and here. Recently, he attempted extortion to stop me from posting comments that convey Beck's deceptions and hypocrisy on Beck's site. For that, he claimed, he's stop his flame war against me.   (What about the other flame warriors angry at my attempts to get through to his stubborn and epistemically closed followers?)  He refused to admit that Beck was a liar and a hypocrite, so there was no deal.

Benny___Hill's current avatar 

Apparently Benny, the racist, Hill decided to escalate his war of hateful words toward me with a campaign of systematic smear.  First, I accuse him, an anonymous sock puppet, of being a racist because he referred to the President of the United States as "your boy." If Obama were white, "boy" is not the word this closet racist would have used. The following is a list of lies that Benny has been pasting into comments in response to every comment of mine that he can find since I didn't bow to his attempted extortion.  His false claims are in black, and the truth of the matter are in blue. This sleazy tactic has been used in that past by Todd, the stalker, Scheller as documented in the first link above.  Having to defend myself against these reactionaries is getting old.  So, Benny, the racist, wrote on Alternet and elsewhere:

How about these many lies from you Victor:

1). You never coined the term "Yellow Propaganda," yet you defended that claim for three days.

This is a smear that has been addressed many times, but Benny is disinterested in facts. His objective is to assassinate my character and smear me.  I did claim to have coined the phrase "yellow propaganda," and when it was pointed out to me that it has been used previously, I looked it up, found that to be true and admitted the error.  1) Mistakes, once admitted, are not "lies." 2) There is never any denial that Beck is a yellow propagandist which is most telling.

2). There were 24 SEALs on the Bin Laden raid, not 39 Seals.

This was an error as well. I've read reports of differing number of Navy SEALs on that mission, so again Benny is calling a mistake about an uncertainty a "lie."

3). There is not limit on the number of post one individual can place in a
thread on this website.

This is an interesting accusation. I've had my comments disappear from both Beck's website and from Alternet.  I'm not sure about the reason or logic behind these disappearing comments, but I am certain that they are gone after a reload of the page.  What makes this assertion particularly sleazy is that Benny cannot possibly know the facts of my claim.  His ignorance does not add up to a "lie" on my part.

4). Your posts are not disappearing.

See #3, above.

5). Taxing the rich will solve the budget problem.

Benny, like Todd before him, is claiming that an opinion about budget strategies is a "lie."  Opinions about the way forward are not lies, and I may well be correct in my opinion as indicated by the Laffer curve.  We could radically raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans to reduce, and eventually eliminate our deficits. That's an opinion.

6). Glenn Beck was fired from Fox News.

Beck was released from Fox before his contract expired.  Why, exactly, is unknown.  I have offered conjecture about why Beck was fired from Fox before his contract expired, but there is not doubt that they wanted him off that channel of propaganda before the presidential campaign heated up.

7). Fox News lost money on Glenn Beck.

This is a claim I made, and it is easily proven for anyone who knows how to use Google.

8). You never made a joke about Jesus and sheep, and then had to later edit because you really did.

In an attempt to convey how disgusting Beck's "jokes" are to progressives, I wrote a regrettable joke on Beck's site about what Jesus did with sheep.  Since the Jesus story is essentially a myth anyway, what's a little extra speculation about Jesus' sex life?  It was a one-off that was forgotten, and when someone accused me of it, initially denied it.  Once someone linked to it, then I did remember adding to the mythology of Jesus in a manner that was as much of an affront to his gullible religunuts as Beck's sleazy and deceitful propaganda against the history of progressivism is to many progressives.  I consequently admitted that I wrote that, but Benny wants to make a forgotten comment (out of over 1,000 there) a "lie."  Expressions of bad memory are not "lies." 

9). I nor anyone else has threatened you on this or any other website.

This is a lie that he's telling, and I have that documented here.

10)You lie about Benny__Hill and say he is a racist. It's not true. How quickly can I find a post where you have said as much?

He's referring to himself in third person.  OK. No one refers to a black man as a "boy" without implying a denigration of some sort, not unlike when Benny calls me "Vicky" and insults my intelligence by calling me retarded. 

11) You claim Sandie has violated the cyber stalking law. It's not true. That's one you'll need to prove. If it were true, and you had filed a complaint, she would already be being prosecuted.

Sandie posted my home address on Beck's website multiple times in an attempt to intimidate me and drive me away.  She also once asked in a comment if I had seen the "car parked up the street." I'm not sure how the police would prosecute a sock-puppet, but this is stalking according to the US Dept. of Justice: 
Stalking generally involves harassing or threatening behavior that an individual engages in repeatedly, such as following a person, appearing at a person's home or place of business, making harassing phone calls, leaving written messages or objects, or vandalizing a person's property. Most stalking laws require that the perpetrator make a credible threat of violence against the victim; others include threats against the victim's immediate family; and still others require only that the alleged stalker's course of conduct constitute an implied threat.
12)You claimed you you are an educated man that acts like a 56 y/o, yet your posts prove otherwise.

This is his opinion, but to claim that I'm not what I am just makes Benny the liar here.

13)And you lie about not hating Beck.

Benny knows what's in my heart?  This is an absurd accusation.  I have no reason to hate Beck as stated previously.  Unlike Benny, he's done nothing to me. Benny lacks the intellectual refinement necessary to distinguish between honest, dispassionate criticism and hatred. This is his problem and amounts to a blatant smear.

14)You lie when you use phonetic spellings of profanity.

The only response I can offer to this bizarre charge is phuck you Benny!

15)You lie when you say Todd has no credibility.

After many attempts to get Todd Scheller to admit that Beck lied about having written his slogan on truth (he bought it as documented by The Daily Caller), Todd wrote that he didn't "give a shit" that Beck lied.  That is why Todd has no credibility, not when it comes to facts, truth, lies and fiction.

16)You lie when you say you are a media critic.

Beck is in the media and I am critical of his lies, hypocrisy, yellow, reactionary propaganda and his ignorance on the topics he addresses. Once again, it's Benny who's lying here.

17)You lie when you try to redefine things like spam.

I quote from Wikipedia usually, so he just doesn't like the definitions that don't comport with his misunderstand of "things like spam."

18)You lie when you claim ad hominem.

Benny's ad hominem attacks on me are based upon a absurd insult, that I'm "dumber than a post" for example.  An ad hominem attack, according to Wikipedia, is "an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it." This is what Benny does.

19)You lie about Beck all the time.

This may be a case of denialism.  I point out only what my research has led me to: Beck is a liar, a hypocrite, a yellow, reactionary propagandist and an ignorant, uneducated charlatan.  Benny's inability to understand these characteristics is his problem, not mine.

20)You lie about conservatives who align with Beck.

I don't know what Benny is referring so since none of these accusations are documented.  First of all, anyone who "aligns with Beck" are not conservative; they are reactionary.  Conservatives were becoming almost as critical of Beck on Fox as progressive were by the time Beck was fired.

21)You lie about Becks audience.

No; if they accept what he says as the "truth," they're ignorant and gullible. They're not all stupid.

22)You lie about Beck being fired.

See #6 above.

23)You lie about Beck's support of gay marriage.

Beck supports gay civil unions which is strange for a Mormon.  We can only speculate about why.

24)You lie about Van Jones.

No, Beck lies about Van Jones, and that's well documented.  Benny cannot deal with the cognitive dissonance that would accompany his realization that Glenn Beck is a liar.

25)You lie about Beck's intent on 8/28.

Beck told a whopper during his speech on the Washington Mall.  That, too, is well documented.

26)You lie about Beck's record of correction.

Not sure what Benny is suggesting here, but Beck does not correct very many of his false claims.  Media Matters agrees with me about that.  They documented far more of Beck's many false claims that I have had time to uncover.

27)You lie about how Benny "changed" the settings of Disqus to prevent you from receiving notices in your email that she had replied to one of your messages.

Benny is writing about Benny in third person again, or he's copied and pasted someone else's smears.  Again, he's trying to make my experiences online "false" even though he is not experiencing what I am. In other words, see  #3 above.

28)And mostly, you lie about how smart and well educated you are.

I don't ever write about how "smart" I am.  After having my intelligence insulted my Beck's psychotic army, I have mentioned that I'm on a board of directors and have previously been on another board as well as it's executive committee.  I will not document these claims, because I don't want this scumbag army of Beckerheads contacting organizations with which I'm involved.  I have a MASS, and that makes Benny the liar here (again).

29) Lied that Sandie claimed she was a "good Christian"

I never wrote that she was.  Just the opposite is the case. Sandie calls The Glenn Beck Review a "buggy" site because she doesn't want her fellow Beckerheads to see Beck debunked and exposed as a hypocrite here. Since that is a lie, she very clearly is not a good Christian, but none of Beck's flame warriors are abiding by the Golden Rule for that matter. They are all bad people, especially Benny who seems more like a Satanist than a Christian.  I've written that before, and you don't see it on his list here.  Think about that.

30) Lied that TEA Party are mostly racists.

What I wrote was that some of them are racists, and the Tea Party, to their credit, purged one of the more obvious ones.  

31) You claimed Beck is gay, with no proof to support it, other than your assertion. If a former roommate made this accusation on record, where is the record?

The record is a recording in possession of a collaborator who looked into Beck's past. The question of Beck's sexuality was covered here.

32) You provided a quote from Mussolini that Mussolini never said nor wrote.

See #1 and #2 above.  The quote in question is indeed suspect, and I've stopped using that quote ever since finding out that Mussolini probably did not write it.  Once again, this was acknowledged online, and Benny ignores that (cherry picks his "information" which is a form of deception).

33) You lie when you complain that posters remove reply buttons.

This is nonsense.  Posters cannot "remove reply buttons."  

34) You lie when you claim your posts disappear.

See # 4 above. Did I suggest that Benny is desperate?

35) You lied about Todd Scheller neglecting his children.

Scheller is reportedly stalking other people he disagrees with, and many of his comments are posted in the evening hours.  How does Benny know what Scheller's children are doing while Todd is on his computer waging his silly flame wars?  Maybe Todd told Benny that he's a good father?  See # 15 above.

This attempt to smear me is not just character assassination but also psychological warfare.   He could easily change his embarrassing avatar and accuse me of "lying."  This is the type of shit that he pulls, obviously. Benny is desperate to get me to stop pointing out Beck's flaws, and since his attempt at extortion failed, he's decided to escalate his silly, immature and reactionary flame war against me.  Benny, the racist, Hill is another example of the argument made by Sarah Jones (a pseudonym, smart lady) in here piece "Glenn Beck is Deliberately Breeding an Army of Psychotics."  Because of my efforts here and around the Internet, this psychotic army has declared war on me. Benny wonders why I hate him:

Least the casual reader consider this debunking of Benny's false accusations a bit paranoid, someone, who is tracking Beckerhead Todd Scheller's comments wrote this on a Mother Jones post:

Before more people are rendered "psychotic" by Beck's manipulative propaganda, 
get involved
Post a comment or call the police.
All non-spam comments approved
Free speech is practiced here
Please get involved for 10 minutes
Share this URL with your friends
Thank you

Monday, March 5, 2012

Beck and side-kicks smeared Fluke 1st last week on morning zoo radio show

Home Disclaimer Contents For Glenn Beck Share This URL
On February 29th, 2012 Glenn Beck and the other two corporate stooges, Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere, preceded Rush Limbaugh's attack on reproductive rights advocate Sandra Fluke on his morning radio show and website. Although at least three petitions are in circulation to demand Limbaugh apologize (he has, sort of)  and request that the companies advertising during his Premier Radio Networks show pull their ads (five have so far), no one, it seems, but Fluke has noticed that Beck and his side-kicks mocked and demeaned the Georgetown University law student.  Fluke, incidentally, said this morning "I don't think that [Limbaugh's apology], saying that his choice of words was not the best, changes anything, and especially when that statement is issued when he's under significant pressure from his sponsors who have begun to pull their support."

Why is Beck's  program called a morning zoo show with the three stooges?  Listen to them attack Fluke.

The following is copied from Beck's website:

“$3,000. How much sex do you have to have for your contraception to cost three grand during law school?” Pat asked. 
“You would have to have sex three times a day the entire time you were in law school,” Stu explained.
Three times a day? Who is having sex three times a day?
Well, as the guys pointed out you could have a disorder. You could also possibly be a prostitute. You could be abstaining from sex except for one day a week and having sex 21 times on a Saturday
“Who are we to say that’s skanky or slutty in any way? Good for you. It should all be paid for by us,” Pat joked.
“You want to have sex 21 times a week, go ahead. I don’t care,” Glenn said. “You should have to pay for (the condoms).”
As the guys went through her audio, she said she was on a “public interest scholarship” to go to Georgetown.
“She wants more public money to have a lot of sex,” Pat said.
“What kind of country do we live in? Where we can’t provide unlimited access to protected sex? For college students who aren’t paying in the first place to go to school! How could we live with ourselves?” Pat wondered.
It only got worse. Fluke said she got together a lot of the students and went to the university to say how much of a problem it was that they weren’t paying for her contraception. She said,  "expected that when 94% of students opposed the policy, the university would respect our choices regarding insurance.”
“Stop just a second. Here’s an idea. If I can get all the students to organize and we could go to the Dean’s office and I can get 94% of all students to sign up saying, I just want the degree without doing any of the work, we expect that. 94% of us want the degree without doing any of the work, (the university) wouldn’t go for it! That’s crazy!” Glenn exclaimed.
“94% of us want steak and lobster dinner every night for free and they won’t do it. We just expected it. Surf and turf every night,” Pat joked.
“I’m ready to get on a handmade boat and sail to Cuba. I can’t live in a country like this,” Stu joked.
“By the way, she’s talking about $3,000 a year that’s creating this hardship. $3,000 a year! You can go on the internet as I have just done to a fantastic website, and you can get any birth control pill for three packs for $80. So that would give you about, say, $25 a month. There’s another one for 20 Bucks a month here. You are talking between $700 and $900 for a year. Not $3,000 a year. That’s if you want the pill,” Stu said.
“If you want to have condoms and you are not having sex three times a day and you don’t want to go to Planned Parenthood that we’re funding for the free condoms… how many avenues?” he continued.
“We have to not only give them these rights but give them the way they want, where they want them, the store they want them, the pharmacy they want them, the classroom they want them. The position she wants to have it in, every single thing, we have to pay her for. It’s insanity!” Stu exclaimed
“This liberal mentality, this progressive mentality. It’s killing us. It’s absolutely killing us. Did you ever think we would get to a point where you would have this sort of entitlement mentality?” Pat asked.
First of all, Fluke wasn't discussing condoms. Next, the birth control pill, as she explained, is used for medical reasons beyond preventing pregnancy, a point ignored by these three stooges. All three ignorantly act like the pill is purchased once for each sex act.

Before Rush Limbaugh called her a "slut" Wednesday afternoon, Beck implied it ("sex 21 times a week"). The author of the article on Beck's web site wrote, "You could also possibly be a prostitute."  Limbaugh has caught virtually all of the heat over his obscene attacks on Fluke, but these three stooges are deserving of every bit as much heat. If you want to have Mr. Beck apologize, then let his boss at Premier Radio Networks, Mr. Kinchen, know you want Beck to apologize. His number is 818-377-5321 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            818-377-5321      end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

actually taken other reactionaries

If you think that Beck and his side-kicks are just "entertainers" who are laughed at by their listeners, think again. The following are photo captured, and therefore unaltered, comments taken from the site where Beck proudly published this ignorant, personal attack on Ms. Fluke.

That is certainly mighty "Christian" of him.

So who's the slut here?

"Their not."  English isn't jojo's only challenge. What, exactly, does the frequency of having sex have to do with the cost of the pill?  Jojo, who seems to have created that profile to make that one comment, must be a male.  "They should be studying in LAW SCHOOL!!!!"  How can law student ever have time for sex...or for health care for that matter?

Anyone want to take up a collection to pay for tickets for Stu, Pat and Beck and their one-way trip to Cuba, or anywhere else?

Update, 3/15/2012: Premiere Networks, which distributes Rush Limbaugh as well as a host of other right-wing talkers, sent an email out to its affiliates early Friday listing 98 large corporations that have requested their ads appear only on “programs free of content that you know are deemed to be offensive or controversial (for example, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Tom Leykis, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity).”

For a summary about Glenn Beck, see "Becoming Paul Revere"

Before more people start tuning into Beck's reactionary, yellow propaganda
get involved!
Post a comment
All non-spam comments approved
Free speech is practiced here
Please get involved for 10 minutes
Thank you