LMAO! What a bunch of transparent shills for a lunatic fringe rag like MediaSmatters. Their lies fill up 53, that's FIFTY-THREE pages at NewsBusters. Don't take my word for it, find out what outrageous scumrag liars they are. (Of course, if you didn't already know.) http://tinyurl.com/26x86za
The Glenn Beck Review replies in blue:
I not only reviewed the site and read some of the articles there, I contacted News Busters and invited them to fact check my fact-checking. You seem to think that you're dealing with an ideologue here, but the first priority of The Glenn Beck Review is to get the facts right. Are you making the absurd claim that Media Matters for America never gets the facts right? If there is something here that cites them as a source, the Review will investigate any charges of inaccurate or misleading claims. Anyone defending Glenn Beck has no business accusing others of being "transparent shill for a lunatic fringe" when many of Beck's claims are sheer lunacy. You want to have a good look at the lunatic fringe, take a long look in the mirror.
* The three smell-tests little Lisa offers as Libertarian are exactly what proves Paulbots as immature, unprincipled and stone ignorant children. It also proves them only one-half step above the sniveling brats of a Progs.
No one offering support for a liar, a hypocrite and a fraud is in any position to deride others as "unprincipled and stone ignorant children." As pointed out in my reply, "you're a mean-spirited prick" like Glenn Beck is as documented in Common Nonsense: Glenn Beck and the Triumph of Ignorance (Wiley, May 2010) I don't expect you to read it; you don't seem like the open minded type.
* The unimaginable lie that our Founding Fathers weren't religious and did not establish our freedom utilizing the wisdom they learned from it is clear stupidity at face value. Regardless of faith learned or practiced, they knew morality played a foundational role in obtaining and maintaining liberty for America...Their quotes clearly reveal it. To even suggest that the separation of church and state is a complete refusal of religious influence on government is a Communist invention designed to destroy democracies.
The quotes of the Founding Fathers also show that Madison, a very religious man, and Jefferson were both clear about the separation between church and state. The guest post on Madison made it very clear that he was an extremely religious man, so your accusation is clearly ignorant of what is contained in The Glenn Beck Review. No one is arguing that morality did not play a roll in the founding of our Republic. You don't address Houserman's points, namely that Barton is a historical revisionist (in the fictional sense of the word) who pulls "facts" out of his ass, facts, as I've documented, that even HE disagrees with. You also don't address the video Houserman points to with a hot link by an expert on the subject, Chris Rodda. No one here suggested - EVER - "that the separation of church and state is a complete refusal of religious influence on government." Your ignorance of the blog contents is overwhelming! Your reactionary hero, Glenn Beck, is the biggest threat to our democratic Republic which is not a democracy. Even Beck understands this. Beck's irresponsible and divisive rhetoric is also inciting violence as seen in a recent shoot out with CA. police after a routine traffic stop. The anti-government fanatic was after one of Beck's targets, the Tides Foundation and allegedly wanted to "start a revolution." See "Was alleged CA gunman influenced by Fox News?"
* Little Lisa's bewilderment of Beck's rightful outrage over a bigoted Socialist who was elected president apprentice and is dismantling the foundations of our liberty within two years, is yet another testament to her stone ignorance. It's truly a sickening confession, really.
Actually, the sickening confession is your ignorant claim that President Obama is a "bigoted Socialist." Sure, that's the information you're getting from your reactionary sources including Glenn Beck; but if you actually pay attention to what the left is writing, you'd know that they are deeply disappointed with the President to date. Perhaps the most strident in his criticism in this regard is David Micheal Green as articulated on his site, The Regressive Antidote. You will not appreciate his POV because he's writing against reactionaries like yourself, but he's also critical of President Obama in a manner that your right wing "news" sources do not begin to convey. It would destroy the narrative and your false claim that this President is "Socialist." Since you probably won't read Green's work, let my quote him briefly. From "The do-nothing 44th President:"
Barack Obama has five major problems as president. The first is that he doesn’t understand priorities. The second is that he seems to have little strong conviction on any given issue. The third is that to the extent he stands for anything, it is for maintenance of a status quo that continues to wreck the country in order to service the greed of a few oligarchs. The fourth is that he fundamentally does not understand the powers and the role of the modern presidency. And the fifth is that he maintains the worst communications apparatus in the White House since Jimmy Carter prowled its corridors. In fairness to his communications team, though, he has given them almost nothing to sell. You try singing the praises of bailing out Goldman Sachs one hundred cents on the dollar, or of a health care plan that forces people to buy plans they don’t want from hated insurance vultures. It ain’t easy, pal. Yet, on the other hand, Bush and Cheney had far less than nothing to sell when it came to the Iraq war – indeed, they had nothing but lies – and their team handled that masterfully.
Oh, I could go on to completely burn up the rest of the authors as well as this joke of a blog in mindless twaddle but, sniveling brats rarely, if ever, benefit from the truth without an earth-shaking epiphany preceding it. Call if you ever mature enough to reach yours and the lessons will continue.
Burn away, you ignorant, name-calling reactionary; I'm so ready to take on Beckerheads that I'm gnawing at the bit in anticipation of your next, nasty, numbingly negative, nauseating, name-calling, near-sighted, meme infested comment. Remember what Glenn Beck (hypocritically) lectured about last week: context matters! You can start by telling readers of The Glenn Beck Review where you received your post-secondary education if you have any. You can also provide a sense of courage and honesty by telling us your real name, so we can fact-check your claim - if you make it - of having higher education. Quid pro quo, "wing hunter," quid pro quo.
Before more people start tuning into Beck's deceitfulpropaganda,
get involvedPost a commentAll non-spam comments approvedFree speech is practiced here------------------------------------------------------Please get involved for 10 minutesShare this URL with your friendshttp://sharethisurlaboutglennbeck.comThank you